Package Details: unity-editor-bin 5.6.5x2017.2.1+f1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/unity-editor-bin.git (read-only)
Package Base: unity-editor-bin
Description: The world's most popular development platform for creating 2D and 3D multiplatform games and interactive experiences.
Upstream URL: https://unity3d.com/
Keywords: dev develop engine game IDE unity3d
Licenses: custom
Conflicts: unity-editor
Provides: unity-editor=5.6.5x2017.2.1+f1
Submitter: edh
Maintainer: edh
Last Packager: edh
Votes: 21
Popularity: 1.122296
First Submitted: 2015-08-29 17:13
Last Updated: 2018-02-12 17:57

Dependencies (19)

Required by (10)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

edh commented on 2018-03-23 17:57

@spacepluk Thanks for the offer but I must thankfully decline. I don't think I can add to a package which already has an active maintainer and 3 co-maintainers. The only suggestion I can give you is to use a split package approach. It is odd seeing a program which builds on top of the same source and has identical setup functions but a multitude of package bases.

spacepluk commented on 2018-03-23 13:11

@edh want to come over and help on unity-editor/unity-editor-beta?

edh commented on 2018-03-14 19:52

Debian packages are unfortunately only provided sporadically by upstream. I will update the package if one is available. Otherwise the package must simply be outdated for some time. However please still refrain from flagging the package as there is nothing I can do which will make it more recent.

edh commented on 2018-02-12 18:12

I am toying with the idea of filing a deletion request for this package even though upstream apparently will continue to provide debian packages. The main reasons are that the speed difference in building has become negligible between the -bin package and the non-bin one and the installer which is used by the non-bin package can now be properly parameterized plus it is much more flexible. Please let me know whether you would like to see this package keep existing or whether you agree to the above mentioned criticism.

edh commented on 2018-02-12 17:58

Upstream just released a debian package again. Updating...

edh commented on 2018-01-18 18:56

Unfortunately upstream seems to have stop providing debian packages. I will wait another couple of days (at most a few weeks) and will delete the package if there is still no official debian package available.

edh commented on 2017-04-12 16:47

@amurrux @luckyroy
I am sorry to hear, that the program is not working for you. However I am unable to reproduce the error using a clean chroot on my computer.
Though I can not be absolutely certain that the package is not at fault, I would nevertheless recommend that you voice your concerns on the unity forums or their bug tracker.

luckyroy commented on 2017-04-11 20:06

@ammurux; Same here, I'm having the same startup failures on unity-editor 1:5.6.0f3+20170331-1 as are others. Anyone know a "stable" startup release to fall back on?

amurrux commented on 2017-04-04 13:37

UPDATE:
after running "valgrind ./Unity" I've got the following output:
Process terminating with default action of signal 6 (SIGABRT): dumping core
==28334== at 0x10E97A10: raise (in /usr/lib/libc-2.25.so)
==28334== by 0x10E99139: abort (in /usr/lib/libc-2.25.so)
==28334== by 0xD6C6EC: HandleSignal(int, siginfo*, void*) (in /opt/Unity/Editor/Unity)
==28334== by 0x21044C42: ??? (in /opt/Unity/Editor/Data/MonoEmbedRuntime/libmono.so)
==28334== by 0x20FA8A12: ??? (in /opt/Unity/Editor/Data/MonoEmbedRuntime/libmono.so)
==28334== by 0x8965FDF: ??? (in /usr/lib/libpthread-2.25.so)
==28334== by 0xA39F95D: tcmalloc::CentralFreeList::FetchFromSpans() (in /opt/Unity/Editor/libcef.so)
==28334== by 0xA39FD18: tcmalloc::CentralFreeList::FetchFromSpansSafe() (in /opt/Unity/Editor/libcef.so)
==28334== by 0xA39FDA1: tcmalloc::CentralFreeList::RemoveRange(void**, void**, int) (in /opt/Unity/Editor/libcef.so)
==28334== by 0xA3B1CF0: tcmalloc::ThreadCache::FetchFromCentralCache(unsigned long, unsigned long) (in /opt/Unity/Editor/libcef.so)
==28334== by 0xCF989F4: tc_malloc_skip_new_handler (in /opt/Unity/Editor/libcef.so)
==28334== by 0xA40A688: base::UncheckedMalloc(unsigned long, void**) (in /opt/Unity/Editor/libcef.so)



===========================
I'm getting error while trying to launch the unity-editor. Splash screen appears and all then I create a new project and oops, It crashes with a SIGABRT.
I executed it with gdb and I got the following output:


Starting program: /opt/Unity/Editor/Unity
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/usr/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
[New Thread 0x7ffff7fe0700 (LWP 23516)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe1262700 (LWP 23517)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe1061700 (LWP 23518)]
[New Thread 0x7fffdcc04700 (LWP 23553)]
[New Thread 0x7fffdc403700 (LWP 23554)]
[New Thread 0x7fffdb0fc700 (LWP 23555)]
[New Thread 0x7fffda6a3700 (LWP 23557)]
[New Thread 0x7fffd9ea2700 (LWP 23558)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe0827700 (LWP 23559)]
[New Thread 0x7fffd965b700 (LWP 23560)]
[New Thread 0x7fffd963a700 (LWP 23561)]
[New Thread 0x7fffd7fba700 (LWP 23562)]
[New Thread 0x7fffc75b3700 (LWP 23563)]
[New Thread 0x7ffff7fa8700 (LWP 23564)]
[New Thread 0x7ffff7e19700 (LWP 23565)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe0806700 (LWP 23566)]
[New Thread 0x7fffc6db2700 (LWP 23567)]
[New Thread 0x7fffc65b1700 (LWP 23568)]
[New Thread 0x7fffc5db0700 (LWP 23569)]
[New Thread 0x7fffc55af700 (LWP 23570)]
[New Thread 0x7fffc4dae700 (LWP 23571)]
[New Thread 0x7fffc45ad700 (LWP 23572)]
[New Thread 0x7fffc3dac700 (LWP 23573)]
[Thread 0x7fffdc403700 (LWP 23554) exited]
[New Thread 0x7fffdc403700 (LWP 23578)]
[New Thread 0x7fffc339e700 (LWP 23579)]
[New Thread 0x7fffc2b9d700 (LWP 23580)]
[New Thread 0x7fffc239c700 (LWP 23581)]
[New Thread 0x7fffc131b700 (LWP 23582)]
[New Thread 0x7fffc065c700 (LWP 23585)]
[New Thread 0x7fffbf996700 (LWP 23593)]
[New Thread 0x7fffbf115700 (LWP 23594)]
[New Thread 0x7fffbe894700 (LWP 23595)]
[New Thread 0x7fffbe093700 (LWP 23617)]
[Thread 0x7fffbe093700 (LWP 23617) exited]
[New Thread 0x7fffbe093700 (LWP 23642)]
[New Thread 0x7fffbd892700 (LWP 23643)]
[New Thread 0x7fffb8e8c700 (LWP 23644)]
[Thread 0x7fffb8e8c700 (LWP 23644) exited]
[New Thread 0x7fffb8e8c700 (LWP 23645)]
[New Thread 0x7fffdf85f700 (LWP 23646)]
[New Thread 0x7fffc191d700 (LWP 23647)]

Thread 1 "Unity" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x000000000257f00c in GfxDeviceGLES::~GfxDeviceGLES ()
(gdb)

I've unity-editor-bin 5.6.0xf1-1

edh commented on 2016-05-08 08:57

@DoctorJellyface
Actually merely packages which could be build from source but are not should be suffixed with -bin. This is the reason why it is okay that the package you co-maintain is called unity-editor. This packages however goes one step further and simply repackages the content of the debian package: A already complete binary package ready to use on debian. It is more about whether your actually build a package or are repacking one. This saves quite a lot of disk space on assembling the files is faster. The naming convention for this is to suffix it with -bin because it repackages a already existing binary package. Bear in mind that it is not bound to debian. If the rpm package at some point offers better Arch compatibility, it would be a reason to switch.
Just search through the AUR and reassure yourself of this naming schema.

All comments